Every manager, of any level, can come up with valuable ways to improve the competitive position of his or her workplace. Corpocheck provides managers around the world with the sparks for driving just that. Join free!
About    Log In    Upgrade    
Every manager, of any level, can come up with valuable ways to improve the competitive position of his or her workplace. Corpocheck provides managers around the world with the sparks for driving just that.  Get Inspired (Free)
Get Inspired (Free)
Drive Change
CORPOCHECK
  • Profitability & Growth
  • Operational Efficiency
  • Control & Oversight
  • Get Active
  • Profitability & Growth
  • Operational Efficiency
  • Control & Oversight
  • Get Active
CORPOCHECK
  • Profitability & Growth
  • Operational Efficiency
  • Control & Oversight
  • Get Active
  • Profitability & Growth
  • Operational Efficiency
  • Control & Oversight
  • Get Active

Is your profitability rate “stuck”? Dive into it.

Dr. Sharon Gotteiner, CPA, Editor of Corpocheck.org Dr. Sharon Gotteiner, CPA, Editor of Corpocheck.org

The firm’s profitability rate is a soup of margins, related to various product categories and customer segments. Diving into that soup is the key to improved profitability.

Are we in agreement that insufficient margins should not be tolerated? If so, you may be on your way to increase your profitability – even if your current profitability is reasonable. This is not obvious. In many cases, the overall level of profitability can be reasonable, although accommodating some segments’ negative margins. Many firms can afford that, and bear such margins for “strategic” justifications. Yes, “strategic” is pronounced with a wink. “Strategic” customers or products, in this context, are defined as customers or products on which you lose. Another example is the “One-Stop Shop” strategy, followed by many companies, although that may require the offering of some losing products too.  That fine as long as a company can afford that. But many companies gave up on that strategy, after experiencing a crisis, which threatened their existence. Retreating such a strategy was actually found as an effective turnaround strategy. Therefore, you better identify challenging products, or customers, or segments, and respond – as soon as the overall level of profitability starts to decline.

How to do that? Think of any possible segment and get its margin. What you should look for is negative margins, for the sake of addressing them. There is a risk involved in such a simple exercise though: Wrong data can lead to mistaken decisions. What can be so complicated with extracting data? Surprisingly, quite a lot. There may be an inaccurate assignment of costs to revenues, due to some “system limitations” in recording data or loading it into the system. It could also be a matter of how your Information Entities (sorry, that’s how it is called) are organized, e.g., products, product categories, customers, customer segments, branches, geographies, agents, sales-persons, sales-teams, etc. Basically, you should be able to get the margin of each unit in those groups – unless your data structure does not support that. Usually, the case will not a binary, meaning either you have that or not. The case will often be “complicated”. For example, Yes, you can get the margin for each customer, but for many customers, we get specific quotations and discounts from suppliers, which are recorded separately and not assigned to any specific customer. Or some significant deals that involve several business units and sales organizations, and therefore managed on the headquarter level, without any allocation of higher resolution. It’s always “complicated”. In fact, I do not recall ever enjoying a simple analysis. That’s fine, the challenge is enjoyable, but be careful when analyzing data.

What do you do with such an analysis? Here comes in the role of the top management at its best. Each Information Entity having a negative margin should be considered: Can that item turn into a profitable one? What steps should be taken to achieve that? Otherwise – should that item be maintained? Eliminated? There are also opportunities to take “conditional-elimination” decisions. For example, increase the price of a losing product. If demand levels hold – it is saved from elimination. If not, the lower demand will lead to its self-elimination.

Stay responsive to margins. Use real-time data as much as possible.

The opinions expressed through this website do not suit all business circumstances.

 

 

Operational Efficiency

Operational improvements – Where to start from?

Operational Efficiency

Challenged operations? Two guidelines and one slide that will help trigger a change

Operational Efficiency

Examination of operating expenses – 4 questions for which you should get answers

Dr. Sharon Gotteiner, CPA, Editor of Corpocheck.org

Control & Oversight

No purchase order? Sorry… the System requires a PO number for processing a payment

Dr. Sharon Gotteiner, CPA, Editor of Corpocheck.org

Supplier payments: 5 control-areas to maintain

Control & Oversight

Large-volume projects: Detect deviations earlier

Control & Oversight
Business Schools
Sponsorship Options

About   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Contact Us   |   Sponsorship Options

© Corpocheck Global Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Scroll to top
Skip to content
Open toolbar

Accessibility Tools

  • Increase Text
  • Decrease Text
  • Grayscale
  • High Contrast
  • Negative Contrast
  • Light Background
  • Links Underline
  • Readable Font
  • Reset
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok